Sony E 16mm F/2.8 vs Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro
Sony E 16mm F/2.8 vs Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro
When comparing Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro and Sony E 16mm F/2.8, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sony E 16mm F/2.8 which weighs 67 g, compared to the loser Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro which weighs 195 g.
Winner: Sony E 16mm F/2.8
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
2. Compare minimum focusing distance
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 10 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 24 cm for Sony E 16mm F/2.8.
Winner: Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sony E 16mm F/2.8 and Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro:
| Sony E 16mm F/2.8 | Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sony | Fujifilm |
| Weight | 67 g | 195 g |
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Focal Length | 16 mm | 30 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic Lens | No | Missing |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 24 cm | 10 cm |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Filter Thread | 49 | 43 |
| Stabilization | No | Missing |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | No | No |