SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x vs SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x
SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x vs SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x
When comparing SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x and SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x, which one is better?
1. Compare minimum focusing distance
Both lenses have the same minimum focusing distance and therefore one is not better than the other when it comes to how close the lens can focus.
Winner: Tied
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x and SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x:
| SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x | SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x | |
 |  | |
| Brand | SLR Magic | SLR Magic |
| Weight | Missing | 1360 g |
| Mount | Canon EF | Micro Four Thirds |
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 50 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.4 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic Lens | Yes | Yes |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 110 cm | 110 cm |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Filter Thread | Missing | |
| Stabilization | Missing | No |