SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x vs Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art (Sony E)
SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x vs Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art (Sony E)
When comparing Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art (Sony E) and SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x, which one is better?
1. Compare minimum focusing distance
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art - (Sony E) is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 30 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 110 cm for SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x.
Winner: Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art (Sony E)
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x and Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art (Sony E):
| SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art - (Sony E) | |
 |  | |
| Brand | SLR Magic | Sigma |
| Weight | Missing | 640 g |
| Mount | Canon EF | Sony E |
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| Anamorphic Lens | Yes | No |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 110 cm | 30 cm |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Filter Thread | Missing | 67 |
| Stabilization | Missing | No |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Missing | Yes |