SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x vs Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x vs Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
When comparing Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM and SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x, which one is better?
1. Compare minimum focusing distance
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 110 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 145 cm for Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM.
Winner: SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x and Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM:
| SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 35mm T2.4 2x | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM | |
 |  | |
| Brand | SLR Magic | Canon |
| Year | Missing | 1996 |
| Weight | Missing | 765 g |
| Mount | Canon EF | Canon EF |
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 200 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.4 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic Lens | Yes | No |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 110 cm | 145 cm |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Filter Thread | Missing | 72 |
| Stabilization | Missing | No |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Missing | Yes |