When comparing Sigma 200mm f/2 DG OS Sony E and Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art (Sony E), which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art - (Sony E) which weighs 640 g, compared to the loser Sigma 200mm f/2 DG OS - Sony E which weighs 1800 g.
Winner: Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art (Sony E)
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art - (Sony E) is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 30 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 170 cm for Sigma 200mm f/2 DG OS - Sony E.
Winner: Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art (Sony E)
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art (Sony E) and Sigma 200mm f/2 DG OS Sony E:
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art - (Sony E) | Sigma 200mm f/2 DG OS - Sony E | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Sigma | Sigma |
Weight | 640 g | 1800 g |
Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
Focal Length | 35 mm | 200 mm |
Largest Aperture | 1.4 | 2 |
Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 30 cm | 170 cm |
Type | Prime | Prime |
Filter Thread | 67 | 105 |
Stabilization | No | Yes |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Yes |
Stabilization Type | Missing | Sigma Optical Stabilizer (OS) |