Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony vs Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G

Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony vs Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G

When comparing Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G and Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony, which one is better?

1. Compare weight

The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony which weighs 1130 g, compared to the loser Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G which weighs 1390 g.

Winner: Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony

Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.

2. Compare minimum focusing distance

When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 28 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 87.5 cm for Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony.

Winner: Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G

Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).

Specifications

Full specifications table of Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony and Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G:

	Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony	Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G
	Price ➔	Price ➔
Brand	Sigma	Sony
Weight	1130 g	1390 g
Mount	Sony E	Sony E
Focal Length	135 mm	16 - 35 mm
Largest Aperture	1.8	3.1
Anamorphic Lens	No	No
Minimum Focusing Distance	87.5 cm	28 cm
Type	Prime	Zoom
Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread)	Missing	114 mm
Stabilization	No	No
Parfocal	Missing	Yes
Covers a Full Frame Sensor?	Yes	Yes