Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro vs Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony
Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro vs Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony
When comparing Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony and Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro which weighs 236 g, compared to the loser Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony which weighs 1130 g.
Winner: Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
2. Compare minimum focusing distance
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 16 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 87.5 cm for Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony.
Winner: Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro and Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony:
| Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro | Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sony | Sigma |
| Weight | 236 g | 1130 g |
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Focal Length | 50 mm | 135 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 16 cm | 87.5 cm |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Filter Thread | 55 | Missing |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Yes |