When comparing Sigma 500mm f/5,6 DG DN OS Sports Sony E and Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony, which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony which weighs 1130 g, compared to the loser Sigma 500mm f/5,6 DG DN OS Sports - Sony E which weighs 1365 g.
Winner: Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 87.5 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 320 cm for Sigma 500mm f/5,6 DG DN OS Sports - Sony E.
Winner: Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony and Sigma 500mm f/5,6 DG DN OS Sports Sony E:
Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony | Sigma 500mm f/5,6 DG DN OS Sports - Sony E | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Sigma | Sigma |
Weight | 1130 g | 1365 g |
Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
Focal Length | 135 mm | 500 mm |
Largest Aperture | 1.8 | 5.6 |
Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 87.5 cm | 320 cm |
Type | Prime | Prime |
Filter Thread | Missing | 95 |
Stabilization | No | Yes |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Yes |
Stabilization Type | Missing | Sigma Optical Stabilizer 2 (OS2) |