Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) vs Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS
Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) vs Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS
When comparing Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS and Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom), which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS which weighs 840 g, compared to the loser Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) which weighs 5800 g.
Winner: Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) and Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS:
| Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) | Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Panavision | Sony |
| Weight | 5800 g | 840 g |
| Mount | Missing | Sony E |
| Focal Length | 70 - 200 mm | 70 - 200 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 3.5 | 4 |
| Anamorphic Lens | Yes | No |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 175.3 cm | Missing |
| Type | Zoom | Zoom |
| Stabilization | Missing | Yes |
| Parfocal | Missing | No |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Missing | Yes |
| Stabilization Type | Missing | Sony Optical SteadyShot (OSS) |