Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 8mm F3.5 WR
Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 8mm F3.5 WR
When comparing Fujifilm Fujinon XF 8mm F3.5 WR and Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom), which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Fujifilm Fujinon XF 8mm F3.5 WR which weighs 220 g, compared to the loser Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) which weighs 5800 g.
Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 8mm F3.5 WR
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 8mm F3.5 WR:
| Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) | Fujifilm Fujinon XF 8mm F3.5 WR | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Panavision | Fujifilm |
| Weight | 5800 g | 220 g |
| Mount | Missing | Fujifilm X |
| Focal Length | 70 - 200 mm | 8 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Anamorphic Lens | Yes | No |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 175.3 cm | Missing |
| Type | Zoom | Prime |
| Filter Thread | Missing | 62 |
| Stabilization | Missing | No |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Missing | Yes |