P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4 vs Tokina Vista 25mm T1.5 PL
P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4 vs Tokina Vista 25mm T1.5 PL
When comparing Tokina Vista 25mm T1.5 PL and P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4 which weighs 1750 g, compared to the loser Tokina Vista 25mm T1.5 PL which weighs 2190 g.
Winner: P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
2. Compare minimum focusing distance
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Tokina Vista 25mm T1.5 PL is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 35 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 51 cm for P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4.
Winner: Tokina Vista 25mm T1.5 PL
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4 and Tokina Vista 25mm T1.5 PL:
| P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4 | Tokina Vista 25mm T1.5 PL | |
 |  | |
| Brand | P+S Technik | Tokina |
| Weight | 1750 g | 2190 g |
| Mount | Arri PL Mount | Arri PL Mount |
| Dimensions | Missing | |
| Focal Length | Missing | 25 mm |
| Largest Aperture | Missing | 1.5 |
| Anamorphic Lens | Yes | Missing |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 51 cm | 35 cm |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | Missing | 114 mm |