Canon 7-63mm T2.6 vs P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4
Canon 7-63mm T2.6 vs P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4
When comparing P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4 and Canon 7-63mm T2.6, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4 which weighs 1750 g, compared to the loser Canon 7-63mm T2.6 which weighs 1980 g.
Winner: P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
2. Compare minimum focusing distance
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4 is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 51 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 60 cm for Canon 7-63mm T2.6.
Winner: P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of Canon 7-63mm T2.6 and P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4:
| Canon 7-63mm T2.6 | P+S Evolution 2X 32mm T2.4 | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Canon | P+S Technik |
| Weight | 1980 g | 1750 g |
| Mount | Arri PL Mount | Arri PL Mount |
| Dimensions | Missing | |
| Focal Length | 7 - 63 mm | Missing |
| Largest Aperture | 2.6 | Missing |
| Anamorphic Lens | Missing | Yes |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 60 cm | 51 cm |
| Type | Zoom | Prime |
| Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | 95 mm | Missing |