When comparing Fujifilm Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR and Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2), which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Fujifilm Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR which weighs 995 g, compared to the loser Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) which weighs 4700 g.
Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 99.1 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 100 cm for Fujifilm Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR.
Winner: Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2)
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR:
Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) | Fujifilm Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Panavision | Fujifilm |
Weight | 4700 g | 995 g |
Mount | Missing | Fujifilm X |
Focal Length | 40 - 80 mm | 50 - 140 mm |
Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 2.8 |
Anamorphic Lens | Yes | Missing |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 99.1 cm | 100 cm |
Type | Zoom | Zoom |
Filter Thread | Missing | 72 |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Missing | No |