Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 vs Sigma 35/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon EF)
Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 vs Sigma 35/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon EF)
When comparing Sigma 35/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon EF) and Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art - (Canon EF) which weighs 665 g, compared to the loser Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 which weighs 1900 g.
Winner: Sigma 35/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon EF)
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 and Sigma 35/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon EF):
| Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art - (Canon EF) | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Cooke | Sigma |
| Weight | 1900 g | 665 g |
| Mount | Missing | Canon EF |
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2 | 1.4 |
| Anamorphic Lens | Missing | No |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Stabilization | Missing | No |