Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 vs Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1
Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 vs Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1
When comparing Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 and Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 which weighs 1900 g, compared to the loser Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 which weighs 10300 g.
Winner: Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 and Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1:
| Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 | Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Cooke | Cooke |
| Weight | 1900 g | 10300 g |
| Mount | Missing | |
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 - 140 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2 | 3.1 |
| Anamorphic Lens | Missing | Yes |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | Missing | 72 cm |
| Type | Prime | Zoom |