When comparing Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II and Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM, which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II which weighs 200 g, compared to the loser Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM which weighs 900 g.
Winner: Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 21 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 25 cm for Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II.
Winner: Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM and Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II:
Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Canon | Canon |
Weight | 900 g | 200 g |
Mount | Canon RF | Canon EF |
Focal Length | 24 - 70 mm | 18 - 55 mm |
Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 3.5 - 5.6 |
Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 21 cm | 25 cm |
Type | Zoom | Zoom |
Filter Thread | 82 | 58 |
Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | No |
Stabilization Type | Missing | Canon Image Stabilizer (IS) |