When comparing Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM and Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II, which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM which weighs 165 g, compared to the loser Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II which weighs 200 g.
Winner: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 13 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 25 cm for Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II.
Winner: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II and Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM:
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II | Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Canon | Canon |
Year | Missing | 2021 |
Weight | 200 g | 165 g |
Mount | Canon EF | Canon RF |
Focal Length | 18 - 55 mm | 16 mm |
Largest Aperture | 3.5 - 5.6 | 2.8 |
Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 25 cm | 13 cm |
Type | Zoom | Prime |
Filter Thread | 58 | 43 |
Stabilization | Yes | No |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | No | Yes |
Stabilization Type | Canon Image Stabilizer (IS) | Missing |