When comparing Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM and Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II, which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II which weighs 200 g, compared to the loser Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM which weighs 1530 g.
Winner: Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 25 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 90 cm for Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM.
Winner: Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II and Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM:
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II | Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Canon | Canon |
Year | Missing | 2020 |
Weight | 200 g | 1530 g |
Mount | Canon EF | Canon RF |
Focal Length | 18 - 55 mm | 100 - 500 mm |
Largest Aperture | 3.5 - 5.6 | 4.5 - 7.1 |
Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 25 cm | 90 cm |
Type | Zoom | Zoom |
Filter Thread | 58 | 77 |
Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | No | Yes |
Stabilization Type | Canon Image Stabilizer (IS) | Canon Image Stabilizer (IS) |