Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM vs Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM
Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM vs Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM
When comparing Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM and Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM which weighs 765 g, compared to the loser Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM which weighs 1430 g.
Winner: Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
2. Compare minimum focusing distance
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 39 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 145 cm for Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM.
Winner: Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM and Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM:
| Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM | Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Canon | Canon |
| Year | 1996 | Missing |
| Weight | 765 g | 1430 g |
| Mount | Canon EF | Canon RF |
| Focal Length | 200 mm | 28 - 70 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 2 |
| Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 145 cm | 39 cm |
| Type | Prime | Zoom |
| Filter Thread | 72 | 95 |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Yes |